Comments on: "Dog Day Afternoon"
http://www.metafilter.com/19631/Dog-Day-Afternoon/
Comments on MetaFilter post "Dog Day Afternoon"Sun, 01 Sep 2002 13:29:35 -0800Sun, 01 Sep 2002 13:29:35 -0800en-ushttp://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss60"Dog Day Afternoon"
http://www.metafilter.com/19631/Dog-Day-Afternoon
<a href="http://us.imdb.com/Title?0072890">"Dog Day Afternoon"</a> Is one of my <a href="http://www.deepdiscountdvd.com/dvd.cfm?itemID=WBD001024">favorite movies</a>. In it, Al Pacino plays a born loser who attempts to rob a bank in order to pay for his lover's sex-change operation. It's based on a true story, and you can read the original article that inspired the movie <a href="http://velvet_peach.tripod.com/fpacdogdayafternoon.html">here</a>. Strangely, the real-life robber was able to pay for the sex-change operation with money he got from the proceeds of the film. Also of interest is this <a href="http://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/article.asp?idart=4510">French documentary about the crime.</a>post:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.19631Sun, 01 Sep 2002 10:57:30 -0800grumblebeemoviesfilmalpacinodogdayafternoonsexchangedocumentaryBy: Acetylene
http://www.metafilter.com/19631/Dog-Day-Afternoon#335105
It's one of my favorite movies, too--I still consider it Pacino's best performance. Unfortunately, we seem to have pushed the Tripod server a little far, but thanks anyway for the link!comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.19631-335105Sun, 01 Sep 2002 13:29:35 -0800AcetyleneBy: Vidiot
http://www.metafilter.com/19631/Dog-Day-Afternoon#335106
The Guggenheim Museum in New York currently has an exhibition called "Moving Pictures" (open through January.) It includes a <a href="http://www.guggenheim.org/exhibitions/moving_pictures/highlights_13b.html">nifty installation</a> that shows pieces from the movie adjacent to Woytowicz's (the robber) recollections and recreations of that day.
Worth checking out if you're in NY.comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.19631-335106Sun, 01 Sep 2002 13:29:57 -0800VidiotBy: stbalbach
http://www.metafilter.com/19631/Dog-Day-Afternoon#335110
Woytowicz is the 59,042nd most popular last name (surname) in the United States <a href="http://www.placesnamed.com/w/o/woytowicz.asp">(source)</a>.comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.19631-335110Sun, 01 Sep 2002 13:44:50 -0800stbalbachBy: dobbs
http://www.metafilter.com/19631/Dog-Day-Afternoon#335118
Great flick. But did you have to put three spoilers about it on the front page?comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.19631-335118Sun, 01 Sep 2002 14:15:14 -0800dobbsBy: grumblebee
http://www.metafilter.com/19631/Dog-Day-Afternoon#335127
Egads, slap my wrist!!! I HATE spoilers, and I never thought I be responsible for any. I'm terribly sorry. I just wasn't thinking.
<a href="http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:4oWfVAxRWR8C:velvet_peach.tripod.com/fpacdogdayafternoon.html+%22Frank+Pierson%22+interview+%22dog+day+afternoon%22&hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=UTF-8">Here's a google cache of the page I linked to.</a>comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.19631-335127Sun, 01 Sep 2002 14:59:09 -0800grumblebeeBy: mr_crash_davis
http://www.metafilter.com/19631/Dog-Day-Afternoon#335174
I'm guessing that someone complaining about "spoilers" for a twenty-seven-year-old movie has his tongue firmly planted in his cheek, grumblebee. Otherwise he might be terribly disappointed to learn that Bambi's mother gets shot by hunters.comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.19631-335174Sun, 01 Sep 2002 19:30:32 -0800mr_crash_davisBy: Vidiot
http://www.metafilter.com/19631/Dog-Day-Afternoon#335183
Ohmigosh, she DOES? That's as bad as telling us that Mister Ed didn't really say all his own lines. (shyeah...AS IF!)comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.19631-335183Sun, 01 Sep 2002 20:16:21 -0800VidiotBy: Vidiot
http://www.metafilter.com/19631/Dog-Day-Afternoon#335185
Whoops -- just realized that the "French documentary about the crime" is the same piece referenced in my link to the "nifty installation" at the Guggenheim. (D'oh!) Apologies.comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.19631-335185Sun, 01 Sep 2002 20:25:31 -0800VidiotBy: ttrendel
http://www.metafilter.com/19631/Dog-Day-Afternoon#335225
I agree. What sort of cattle-brained idiot are you Dobbs?comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.19631-335225Mon, 02 Sep 2002 01:18:22 -0800ttrendelBy: grumblebee
http://www.metafilter.com/19631/Dog-Day-Afternoon#335266
Well, at the risk of self-flagellation, I'll come down against spoilers -- even for 27-year-old films. What difference does it make how old it is? There are still folks who haven't seen it (sometimes simply because they are young). A few months ago, I finally got around to reading "War and Peace." It's been around much longer than "Dog Day afternoon," but I would have still been pissed if someone had revealed the plot. I'm less interested in reading "Anna Karenina," because ending has been spoiled for me.comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.19631-335266Mon, 02 Sep 2002 06:27:12 -0800grumblebeeBy: dobbs
http://www.metafilter.com/19631/Dog-Day-Afternoon#335275
ttrendel: <i>What sort of cattle-brained idiot are you Dobbs?</i>
the kind that shaves off one of your eyebrows and calls you bitch.
and the kind that loves movies and hates when people give away character motivations and endings of films people might not have seen yet.
and, so this post isn't completlely useless, anyone who likes DDA should read <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0679756604/qid=1030980374/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/002-2406903-7854456?v=glance&s=books">this book</a>.comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.19631-335275Mon, 02 Sep 2002 08:27:01 -0800dobbsBy: dg
http://www.metafilter.com/19631/Dog-Day-Afternoon#335511
I have never seen the movie, but I really enjoyed the book. I tend not to watch movies if I have already read the book, because they rarely live up to the expectations created.comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.19631-335511Mon, 02 Sep 2002 19:58:26 -0800dgBy: grumblebee
http://www.metafilter.com/19631/Dog-Day-Afternoon#335626
Eh? "Dog Day Afternoon" isn't based on a book. The book bobbs linked to is an autobiography by (and about) the film's director, Sidney Lumet. It's really good, but it isn't the story of DDA.comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.19631-335626Tue, 03 Sep 2002 05:09:33 -0800grumblebeeBy: lampshade
http://www.metafilter.com/19631/Dog-Day-Afternoon#335706
We showed the movie at an outdoor theatre that I run in Brooklyn a couple of weeks ago. It was interesting to note that the actual crime scene was only a couple of miles away. Apparently the "location" bank was a created out of an old factory and as it was being finished, a number of people off the street wandered in asking about opening an account.
<a href="C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Desktop\Iona Toshiba\Text Files\archive\DOG DAY AFTERNOON - Al Pacino's Loft.htm">An Al Pacino Fan Site</a> which has some more background on the film and reprints of various articles from publications from over the years.
My favorite quote...
<b>Sonny:</b> So what country do you want to go to?
<b>Sal:</b> Wyoming.
<b>Sonny:</b> Sal, Wyoming's not a country.comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.19631-335706Tue, 03 Sep 2002 08:13:11 -0800lampshadeBy: dg
http://www.metafilter.com/19631/Dog-Day-Afternoon#336264
<i>... "Dog Day Afternoon" isn't based on a book.</i>
"Dog Day Afternoon" - <a href="http://dogbert.abebooks.com/abe/BookDetails?bi=126777016"> the book</a>comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.19631-336264Tue, 03 Sep 2002 22:04:07 -0800dgBy: dobbs
http://www.metafilter.com/19631/Dog-Day-Afternoon#339397
dg, though you're correct, there is a book, the film was not based on it. (and yes, i realize that you didn't say it was. however, your statement about movies not living up to the books implies you thought they were connected.) the film came out in sep 1975. the book came out in july of the same year. if it had been based on the book, that would be quite a feat. :)comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.19631-339397Sat, 07 Sep 2002 08:21:41 -0800dobbsBy: dg
http://www.metafilter.com/19631/Dog-Day-Afternoon#340792
dobbs, I should have worded my comment better, but I did realise that the book was basically the screenplay published to promote the movie.
I always find that movies fail to live up to the book, perhaps because the movie does not match what I see in my imagination when I read the book.
<small>Of course, you are correct in that the movie was not <b>based</b> on a book :-)</small>comment:www.metafilter.com,2002:site.19631-340792Mon, 09 Sep 2002 16:27:42 -0800dg
"Yes. Something that interested us yesterday when we saw it." "Where is she?" His lodgings were situated at the lower end of the town. The accommodation consisted[Pg 64] of a small bedroom, which he shared with a fellow clerk, and a place at table with the other inmates of the house. The street was very dirty, and Mrs. Flack's house alone presented some sign of decency and respectability. It was a two-storied red brick cottage. There was no front garden, and you entered directly into a living room through a door, upon which a brass plate was fixed that bore the following announcement:¡ª The woman by her side was slowly recovering herself. A minute later and she was her cold calm self again. As a rule, ornament should never be carried further than graceful proportions; the arrangement of framing should follow as nearly as possible the lines of strain. Extraneous decoration, such as detached filagree work of iron, or painting in colours, is [159] so repulsive to the taste of the true engineer and mechanic that it is unnecessary to speak against it. Dear Daddy, Schopenhauer for tomorrow. The professor doesn't seem to realize Down the middle of the Ganges a white bundle is being borne, and on it a crow pecking the body of a child wrapped in its winding-sheet. 53 The attention of the public was now again drawn to those unnatural feuds which disturbed the Royal Family. The exhibition of domestic discord and hatred in the House of Hanover had, from its first ascension of the throne, been most odious and revolting. The quarrels of the king and his son, like those of the first two Georges, had begun in Hanover, and had been imported along with them only to assume greater malignancy in foreign and richer soil. The Prince of Wales, whilst still in Germany, had formed a strong attachment to the Princess Royal of Prussia. George forbade the connection. The prince was instantly summoned to England, where he duly arrived in 1728. "But they've been arrested without due process of law. They've been arrested in violation of the Constitution and laws of the State of Indiana, which provide¡ª" "I know of Marvor and will take you to him. It is not far to where he stays." Reuben did not go to the Fair that autumn¡ªthere being no reason why he should and several why he shouldn't. He went instead to see Richard, who was down for a week's rest after a tiring case. Reuben thought a dignified aloofness the best attitude to maintain towards his son¡ªthere was no need for them to be on bad terms, but he did not want anyone to imagine that he approved of Richard or thought his success worth while. Richard, for his part, felt kindly disposed towards his father, and a little sorry for him in his isolation. He invited him to dinner once or twice, and, realising his picturesqueness, was not ashamed to show him to his friends. Stephen Holgrave ascended the marble steps, and proceeded on till he stood at the baron's feet. He then unclasped the belt of his waist, and having his head uncovered, knelt down, and holding up both his hands. De Boteler took them within his own, and the yeoman said in a loud, distinct voice¡ª HoME²¨¶àÒ°´²Ï·ÊÓÆµ ѸÀ×ÏÂÔØ ѸÀ×ÏÂÔØ
ENTER NUMBET 0016hnqpw.com.cn jy-npm.com.cn jo15.org.cn www.kanjia02.org.cn jnyimu.com.cn www.ggjdggjd.com.cn vrgongyi.com.cn qiyilrs.com.cn www.oomipo.com.cn www.moyushot.org.cn