Comments on: Will they steal the WH china, too?
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too/
Comments on MetaFilter post Will they steal the WH china, too?Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:02:03 -0800Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:02:03 -0800en-ushttp://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss60Will they steal the WH china, too?
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too
Remember the Eliot Spitzer take-down <a href="http://www.metafilter.com/69772/The-takedowns-were-for-free-whores"> thread here on the blue</a>?It turns out that <a href="http://brasschecktv.com/page/291.html">Spitzer's character assassination</a> may have been more Bush Administration sock puppetry -- back on Valentine's Day, Spitzer wrote an <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/13/AR2008021302783_pf.html">editorial</a> in the WaPo demonizing the lack of consumer protections and was about to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-g-brant/eliot-spitzer-george-bus_b_91764.html?page=2&show_comment_id=11987144#comment_11987144">file a lawsuit against several Wall Street firms for predatory lending</a>, but the Justice Department caught him with his fly undone and the papers didn't get filed. <br /><br />As a result, we had that October-November financial collapse and a quiet $200 billion bail-out turned into a $900 billion bail-out. Greg Palast was on it, but the MSM didn't bother to look into it. But this past week, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Spitzer-Prostitution.html">Congress did</a>...post:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.77011Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:59:54 -0800vhsivEliot_SpitzerbailoutBush_Administrationheckuva_jobbait_and_switchBy: jonmc
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too#2359569
So, if Spitzer could keep it in his pants, we'd save $700 billion? That's one expensive spurt, dude.comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.77011-2359569Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:02:03 -0800jonmcBy: Miko
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too#2359588
Yeah, "as a result" should refer to Bush Administration policy, not Spitzer's crimes. He was sleazy and it sounds like this was a politically motivated investigation, but he didn't create the collapse and I don't think his lawsuit could have prevented it - it's just as likely it would have prompted it. It was inevitable - houses of cards eventually fall.comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.77011-2359588Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:08:47 -0800MikoBy: jonmc
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too#2359597
actually at 40 million sperm per ejaculation, that comes to $17,500 per little wiggler. Every sperm may not be sacred, but they sure ain't cheap.comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.77011-2359597Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:11:05 -0800jonmcBy: grounded
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too#2359622
<em>back on Valentine's Day, Spitzer wrote an editorial in the WaPo demonizing the lack of consumer protections</em>
Speaking of a lack of consumer protections, wasn't Spitzer the guy who had a reputation with the escort agency for not wanting to wear a condom?comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.77011-2359622Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:21:26 -0800groundedBy: guanxi
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too#2359626
There was probably not a moment during Spitzer's tenure as governor, or during his previous job(s), when you couldn't find many people on Wall Street, and among their supporters, with motives to do harm to him. Just because he got busted around the time he was pursuing this issue means nothing.comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.77011-2359626Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:22:35 -0800guanxiBy: enn
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too#2359638
Where in the third link does it say that Spitzer was about to file a lawsuit? It seems to say he had joined in litigration several years before, as New York attorney general. Why would a governor file a lawsuit?comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.77011-2359638Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:27:28 -0800ennBy: ryoshu
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too#2359643
This is my shocked face. After the Siegelman conviction the Spitzer hunt was nothing.comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.77011-2359643Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:28:53 -0800ryoshuBy: Lemurrhea
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too#2359662
Isn't it character suicide? Although I disagree with a lot of the vitriol directed against prostitutes & johns, it still is against the law, and he was governor, formerly attorney general. He should be upholding the law, methinks.
(I seem to recall that he was the prosecutor in a moderately large prostitution case, in which case it's definitely character suicide. But I can't find it, because doing a search on google for any variant of Eliot, Spitzer, Prostitution, Case gives me the obvious results)comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.77011-2359662Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:36:13 -0800LemurrheaBy: Pastabagel
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too#2359681
I call bullshit. First, Eliot Spitzer was the governor, not the attorney general. He doesn't file lawsuits, the attorney general does. The papers could have been filed regardless of what happened to him. And it wasn't that the all-powerful "they" caught him with his pants undone, it's that he undid them himself, when he knew damn well he had made a huge target of himself by going after wall street.
Second, are you suggesting that the Bush Administration wanted this financial collapse to happen? Why, so his approval ratings could vanish entirely and the Democrats would sweep the White House and Congress?
Third, lawsuits against lenders for predatory lending have been filed on an ongoing basis since 2005.comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.77011-2359681Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:52:48 -0800PastabagelBy: queensissy
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too#2359712
I was really pissed at Spitzer for not being able to keep it in his pants. He was the first political "hero" I had since... Alan Cranston.comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.77011-2359712Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:08:10 -0800queensissyBy: rokusan
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too#2359839
<i>actually at 40 million sperm per ejaculation, that comes to $17,500 per little wiggler.</i>
New retirement plan for the win!comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.77011-2359839Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:38:07 -0800rokusanBy: rokusan
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too#2359844
<i>Are you suggesting that the Bush Administration wanted this financial collapse to happen? Why, so his approval ratings could vanish entirely...?</i>
Maybe they believed after they hit zero, they'd roll over to 99999.comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.77011-2359844Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:41:16 -0800rokusanBy: cjets
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too#2359867
<em>Maybe they believed after they hit zero, they'd roll over to 99999.</em>
That's a result of his intensive checkers training.
King Me!comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.77011-2359867Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:56:32 -0800cjetsBy: srboisvert
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too#2360233
The moment he got burned I thought it was interesting how he was caught via anti-terrorism/drug trafficking measures. You know the mission creep and privacy invasion that they always promise won't happen when they ask for new invasive powers..comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.77011-2360233Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:55:42 -0800srboisvertBy: Smedleyman
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too#2360481
"Second, are you suggesting that the Bush Administration wanted this financial collapse to happen?"
They didn't?
$900 billion is a pretty big incentive. Gee, I lost the election but funneled billions of dollars to my buddies who will grease me as soon as I get out of office.
Anyway, his testimony got derailed and he wasn't even charged. I'd call that a political character assassination, yeah.
Either way the law was misused. I would like an investigation as to why the federal government spent its time investigating where the governor put his dick rather than, y'know, the economic structure of organized crime, drug syndicates, terrorism outfits and corrupt financial institutions.
Far as I know Bushco not only did allow folks to get ripped off, they actively took steps to prevent states from protecting people from getting ripped off.
Our own AG in Illinois really sounded off about this.
They not only shut down state legislatures looking to stop predatory lending, now, after the fact, they're shoveling yet more taxpayer money at the banking industry.
So did they want the collapse? Yeah.
Oh, not directly. But it always helps to have a big distraction when you loot the place.
$900 billion? Hell, if he could have kept his wick dry he might have had a "car accident."comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.77011-2360481Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:23:39 -0800SmedleymanBy: captainsohler
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too#2360666
Not to mention, the biggest deficit in history. Just like the <em>fiscally responsible </em>Republicans to ram our debt into the dirt, so the next Administration cannot implement social programs.
Just like the Reagan Admin.comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.77011-2360666Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:41:38 -0800captainsohlerBy: DesbaratsDays
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too#2361336
Smedleyman, I fully agree. One parting treasury-grab.comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.77011-2361336Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:37:46 -0800DesbaratsDaysBy: kjars
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too#2361366
The current financial crisis is about much much more than predatory lending.
<em>$900 billion is a pretty big incentive. Gee, I lost the election but funneled billions of dollars to my buddies who will grease me as soon as I get out of office.</em>
Which buddies would those be? The ones booted by their boards? Also, I doubt Bush will need much help when he gets out of office.
Overall, I think the argument is pretty weak. Even when assuming the premise that Spitzer was the victim of character assassination, there's no way to prove a Bush link - Spitzer made a ton of enemies, small and large.
Anyway, a good look at Spitzer's tenure as a prosecutor will reveal some quality character assassination on his part. Live by the sword...comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.77011-2361366Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:31:54 -0800kjarsBy: Aquaman
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too#2361944
Why am I not surprised that penises and vaginas caused all this trouble?comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.77011-2361944Wed, 03 Dec 2008 09:24:49 -0800AquamanBy: homunculus
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too#2362769
Spitzer has a new piece at Slate: <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2205856/">We need to stop using the bailouts to rebuild gigantic financial institutions.</a>comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.77011-2362769Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:57:23 -0800homunculusBy: jckll
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too#2363700
<i>Spitzer has a new piece at Slate: <s>We need to stop using the bailouts to rebuild gigantic financial institutions.</s></i></s><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2205856/"> The Dog Ate My Hard Drive: With lots of easy options, there's no excuse for not backing up your data. Here are the best ways to do it.</a>
<a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2205995/">Thar she blows</a>comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.77011-2363700Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:25:36 -0800jckllBy: homunculus
http://www.metafilter.com/77011/Will-they-steal-the-WH-china-too#2363817
Whoops. Thanks for the save, cklennon.
<a href="http://www.metafilter.com/77091/Steamroll-this">New thread on Spitzer's piece.</a>comment:www.metafilter.com,2008:site.77011-2363817Thu, 04 Dec 2008 09:41:33 -0800homunculus
"Yes. Something that interested us yesterday when we saw it." "Where is she?" His lodgings were situated at the lower end of the town. The accommodation consisted[Pg 64] of a small bedroom, which he shared with a fellow clerk, and a place at table with the other inmates of the house. The street was very dirty, and Mrs. Flack's house alone presented some sign of decency and respectability. It was a two-storied red brick cottage. There was no front garden, and you entered directly into a living room through a door, upon which a brass plate was fixed that bore the following announcement:¡ª The woman by her side was slowly recovering herself. A minute later and she was her cold calm self again. As a rule, ornament should never be carried further than graceful proportions; the arrangement of framing should follow as nearly as possible the lines of strain. Extraneous decoration, such as detached filagree work of iron, or painting in colours, is [159] so repulsive to the taste of the true engineer and mechanic that it is unnecessary to speak against it. Dear Daddy, Schopenhauer for tomorrow. The professor doesn't seem to realize Down the middle of the Ganges a white bundle is being borne, and on it a crow pecking the body of a child wrapped in its winding-sheet. 53 The attention of the public was now again drawn to those unnatural feuds which disturbed the Royal Family. The exhibition of domestic discord and hatred in the House of Hanover had, from its first ascension of the throne, been most odious and revolting. The quarrels of the king and his son, like those of the first two Georges, had begun in Hanover, and had been imported along with them only to assume greater malignancy in foreign and richer soil. The Prince of Wales, whilst still in Germany, had formed a strong attachment to the Princess Royal of Prussia. George forbade the connection. The prince was instantly summoned to England, where he duly arrived in 1728. "But they've been arrested without due process of law. They've been arrested in violation of the Constitution and laws of the State of Indiana, which provide¡ª" "I know of Marvor and will take you to him. It is not far to where he stays." Reuben did not go to the Fair that autumn¡ªthere being no reason why he should and several why he shouldn't. He went instead to see Richard, who was down for a week's rest after a tiring case. Reuben thought a dignified aloofness the best attitude to maintain towards his son¡ªthere was no need for them to be on bad terms, but he did not want anyone to imagine that he approved of Richard or thought his success worth while. Richard, for his part, felt kindly disposed towards his father, and a little sorry for him in his isolation. He invited him to dinner once or twice, and, realising his picturesqueness, was not ashamed to show him to his friends. Stephen Holgrave ascended the marble steps, and proceeded on till he stood at the baron's feet. He then unclasped the belt of his waist, and having his head uncovered, knelt down, and holding up both his hands. De Boteler took them within his own, and the yeoman said in a loud, distinct voice¡ª HoME²¨¶àÒ°´²Ï·ÊÓÆµ ѸÀ×ÏÂÔØ ѸÀ×ÏÂÔØ
ENTER NUMBET 0016jianchan.com.cn www.kanjia02.org.cn www.jcchain.com.cn nsiyo.com.cn slmelec.org.cn www.soriib.com.cn www.mymzmj.com.cn neuvo.com.cn www.ungbrt.com.cn wqliyj.com.cn