Comments on: still not pornography
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography/
Comments on MetaFilter post still not pornographyWed, 15 Dec 2010 14:39:11 -0800Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:39:11 -0800en-ushttp://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss60still not pornography
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography
The <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1TPBQ3nDtU">music video</a> (SLYT) for the New Pornographers' single "Sweet Talk, Sweet Talk" turns the cheerful, bouncy pop tune into an elegy for the ravaged Gulf Coast. (<a href="http://www.metafilter.com/95731/Neither-the-college-nor-the-band-endorses-pornography">The NPs previously.</a>)post:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:19:47 -0800eugenennewpornographerssweettalksweettalkgulfcoastkatrinaoilspilloxfamBy: jnrussell
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography#3422250
Whoa, is that really Neko Case? Doesn't look or sound like her at all. Or maybe the problem is that I'm stilll (apparently) living in 2006 and she's had four years of touring/boozing/getting in fights since then...comment:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579-3422250Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:39:11 -0800jnrussellBy: NoMich
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography#3422262
Goes well with Talk Talk's <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXQYyKzyDaE"><em>It's My Life</em> video</a>.comment:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579-3422262Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:50:09 -0800NoMichBy: mrgrimm
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography#3422272
Where's Dan?comment:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579-3422272Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:56:23 -0800mrgrimmBy: mrgrimm
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography#3422275
Great song, great album, great video. Thanks!comment:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579-3422275Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:57:58 -0800mrgrimmBy: jammy
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography#3422276
thanks, eugenencomment:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579-3422276Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:58:46 -0800jammyBy: poe
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography#3422292
Light, Sweet, Crude. It has a slick beat! I could get down to it.comment:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579-3422292Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:09:03 -0800poeBy: limeonaire
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography#3422330
Fuuuuck. That made me cry.comment:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579-3422330Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:40:44 -0800limeonaireBy: limeonaire
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography#3422346
BTW, this (the oil spill) is why I've spent the better part of the last week trying to find a good petroleum-free moisturizer. I stopped wearing makeup back in April because of it, but I was waiting 'til I reached the end of the bottle of Lubriderm to switch moisturizers. Now it's time—fuck Big Oil.
<small>Of course, I know, I say that, and I'm still driving a car to and from work every day. But it's one step, at least. I just can't stomach buying another bottle of petroleum distillates to rub on my face.</small>comment:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579-3422346Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:50:25 -0800limeonaireBy: jnrussell
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography#3422359
Totally agree with limeonaire, the Deepwater Horizon fiasco is a pretty big motivator for me to shed my oil dependence. Alas, I'm still working up the courage to bike 12 miles to work in the dead of winter.comment:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579-3422359Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:58:30 -0800jnrussellBy: es_de_bah
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography#3422372
thanks for sharing. good ol' nps
all that stock footage of oil pumps suddenly brought to mind the phrase "drill baby, dill."
funny. haven't heard that one too much lately.comment:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579-3422372Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:11:22 -0800es_de_bahBy: rollbiz
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography#3422401
Something in my eye...
I've never been to New Orleans, something I plan to finally correct this spring.
By the way, this afternoon <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/16/us/16suit.html?src=mv">the Department of Justice filed suit</a> against nine companies, including BP, to recover damages relating to the oil spill. It's probably dumb to hope that if they win, they'll make regular folks whole, but can I please hope for now anyway?comment:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579-3422401Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:33:06 -0800rollbizBy: muddgirl
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography#3422529
<i>Whoa, is that really Neko Case? Doesn't look or sound like her at all.</i>
She's 40 years old and isn't wearing make-up and didn't do her hair. That's what some people look like at 40, yes especially if there's some hard living involved. I know it's a little strange to see an older woman on video who isn't styled. I think it's admirable.
Also... I don't know, maybe you should think about what impulse makes your first reaction to this rather powerful video, "Wow, look at that lady!"comment:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579-3422529Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:48:17 -0800muddgirlBy: bardic
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography#3422642
Neko Case is a goddess, make-up or no.comment:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579-3422642Wed, 15 Dec 2010 19:22:27 -0800bardicBy: Slap*Happy
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography#3422682
Umm. This is way to late, and does more evil than good. The little bugs in the water turned out to be more voracious and efficient than thought.* Louisiana seafood is safe and healthy... oysters have filtered out the bad stuff and are clean, shrimp stocks are bountiful, I am dead serious when I say you should have some. An oyster and shrimp po'boy is about God's own perfect sammich.
*We. Got. Lucky. The next time 'round, it will be much, much, much worse. My Dad was telling me his family were dodging tarballs on Jersey beaches as far south as Tom's River, as late as the '70s, from torpedoed tankers during the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Atlantic_(1939%E2%80%931945)">Battle of the Atlantic.</a>comment:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579-3422682Wed, 15 Dec 2010 19:52:32 -0800Slap*HappyBy: mrgrimm
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography#3422750
<i>Where's Dan?</i>
<a href="http://obscuresound.com/2010/12/destroyer-kaputt-2011/">Oh hi, Dan!</a>comment:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579-3422750Wed, 15 Dec 2010 21:10:18 -0800mrgrimmBy: jnrussell
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography#3423212
<em>I don't know, maybe you should think about what impulse makes your first reaction to this rather powerful video, "Wow, look at that lady!"</em>
That's a good point. I clearly should have worded my comment differently. I never meant to imply that Neko Case being unrecognizable to me was a negative thing, nor that it was the only thing I thought about the video. But you're right that it was my first reaction, because it's the first thing I saw in the video. I paused the video to write a comment, then finished the video.
Also some other things to consider:
1. My only exposure to New Pornographers has been through Neko Case's solo career.
2. I had no idea she was in her 40s. I honestly thought she was in her late twenties.
3. The few interviews I've heard with her sounded completely different than she sounds in this video; different tone of voice, different style of speech.
So I see her sitting there and talking and I think "Is that Neko? Of course it is, right? I mean, you know she's in NP...and that's her red hair....but the video's kind of out of focus, and she doesn't sound right, and she seems really different in her manner...less animated, less energetic...well that's probably because she's not onstage..." so then I went on to google and looked for pictures of her and all I could find at first were glossy magazine shots that really look quite different, even her cheekbones looked different.
It was just a moment of audio-visual confusion to me, so I remarked on it. I thought this post was about both NP and the Gulf tragedy. I commented on the first, because that was the first thing I noticed. I had other thoughts to share about the Gulf tragedy (which I did share to some extent later, re: my comment about trying to reduce my oil dependence), but I didn't want to make an overly long post (like I'm doing now, to defend my ill-advised pithy post) highlighting in detail my blubbering and bawling(for me this always happens: powerful music+powerful emotional images=cry like a baby).
It shouldn't matter to me, but I feel like I need to defend myself here, because muddgirl's painting my comment as disparaging of Neko's looks and loading my original comment with these assumptions I apparently have about age and femininity and beauty when all I meant was that I just didn't recognize her visually or aurally and that it was likely my own fault for not following her career or NP that closely.comment:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579-3423212Thu, 16 Dec 2010 08:13:23 -0800jnrussellBy: muddgirl
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography#3423242
<i>because muddgirl's painting my comment as disparaging of Neko's looks and loading my original comment with these assumptions</i>
I don't care whether or not you were disparaging Neko's looks - I would have been equally interested if you had posted, "Wow, I never realized how hot Neko Case is!"
<i>Either way</i>, it is almost stereotypically sexist to comment on a woman's physical appearance (and vocal pleasantness) over anything else in a picture or video. I understand that you didn't intend to post a sexist comment, and I'm sure you didn't even realize that the comment was sexist, but them's the facts. If you actually meant to ask, "Is that Neko Case?" why... that seems like a perfectly cromulent way to phrase an honest question.comment:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579-3423242Thu, 16 Dec 2010 08:37:21 -0800muddgirlBy: jnrussell
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography#3423270
But I wasn't commenting on Neko Case's hotness at any level (disparaging <em>or</em> praiseworthy), only my recognition of her as a person with whom I was somewhat familiar. I never said her voice was less pleasant, either. Only that it sounded different than I remember.
Of course I have sexist tendencies and I want to be conscious of that, so thank you bringing this to my attention. I try very hard to NOT be sexist, to actively police my own biases, assumptions, and actions, and in this case I believe I was not making a statement about Neko within in the context of physical attraction, but rather within the context of recognition. Perhaps I'm wrong and I can't trust my own judgment in these matters. I'll be thinking about this one for awhile.
On a related note, if I had posted that I didn't recognize Carl's appearance and vocal pleasantness (note: I didn't say she sounded worse, just like a different), would we still be having this conversation?comment:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579-3423270Thu, 16 Dec 2010 08:56:54 -0800jnrussellBy: muddgirl
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography#3423300
<i>if I had posted that I didn't recognize Carl's appearance and vocal pleasantness</i>
I extremely dislike "switched gender hypotheticals", mostly because I feel there's a great probability that most people wouldn't notice Carl aging - Carl is a guy and thus almost never wears face-altering make-up or a face-altering hair style. We watch him age gradually rather than all-at-once as the make-up is removed. We're <i>used</i> to watching men age.comment:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579-3423300Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:17:10 -0800muddgirlBy: limeonaire
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography#3423320
But the real question is, can we all agree that Neko Case is awesome? 'Cause seriously: She's awesome.comment:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579-3423320Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:28:01 -0800limeonaireBy: jnrussell
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography#3423376
Yes, Neko Case is awesome. Fox Confessor is one of my favorite albums.
<small>And one last reply to muddgirl: I think I understand, now. There's no way to remark on a woman's appearance without being sexist about it. I've learned a good lesson here, and I'll try to apply it to all my future comments.</small>comment:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579-3423376Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:56:17 -0800jnrussellBy: eugenen
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography#3423378
<em>I extremely dislike "switched gender hypotheticals", mostly because I feel there's a great probability that most people wouldn't notice Carl aging - Carl is a guy and thus almost never wears face-altering make-up or a face-altering hair style. We watch him age gradually rather than all-at-once as the make-up is removed. We're used to watching men age.</em>
That's interesting because if you watch <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzyp3JC9-uU">this video</a> from seven years ago, Carl looks drastically different from what he looks like today, while Neko looks almost exactly the same.comment:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579-3423378Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:57:28 -0800eugenenBy: hydropsyche
http://www.metafilter.com/98579/still-not-pornography#3424219
<i>The little bugs in the water turned out to be more voracious and efficient than thought.* Louisiana seafood is safe and healthy... oysters have filtered out the bad stuff and are clean, shrimp stocks are bountiful, I am dead serious when I say you should have some. An oyster and shrimp po'boy is about God's own perfect sammich.</i>
<a href="http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/index.ssf/2010/12/fda_seafood_testing_procedures.html">Scientists don't agree with you on that one</a>. They say for safety you should probably only eat 1/2 a po'boy a week.
<i>The levels are being measured against a national average of consumption; in terms of shrimp, that translates into one meal a week as small as 3 ounces, or about four jumbo shrimp. The Natural Resources Defense Council survey showed that many Gulf residents consume three to 12 times that amount.</i>comment:www.metafilter.com,2010:site.98579-3424219Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:54:41 -0800hydropsyche
"Yes. Something that interested us yesterday when we saw it." "Where is she?" His lodgings were situated at the lower end of the town. The accommodation consisted[Pg 64] of a small bedroom, which he shared with a fellow clerk, and a place at table with the other inmates of the house. The street was very dirty, and Mrs. Flack's house alone presented some sign of decency and respectability. It was a two-storied red brick cottage. There was no front garden, and you entered directly into a living room through a door, upon which a brass plate was fixed that bore the following announcement:¡ª The woman by her side was slowly recovering herself. A minute later and she was her cold calm self again. As a rule, ornament should never be carried further than graceful proportions; the arrangement of framing should follow as nearly as possible the lines of strain. Extraneous decoration, such as detached filagree work of iron, or painting in colours, is [159] so repulsive to the taste of the true engineer and mechanic that it is unnecessary to speak against it. Dear Daddy, Schopenhauer for tomorrow. The professor doesn't seem to realize Down the middle of the Ganges a white bundle is being borne, and on it a crow pecking the body of a child wrapped in its winding-sheet. 53 The attention of the public was now again drawn to those unnatural feuds which disturbed the Royal Family. The exhibition of domestic discord and hatred in the House of Hanover had, from its first ascension of the throne, been most odious and revolting. The quarrels of the king and his son, like those of the first two Georges, had begun in Hanover, and had been imported along with them only to assume greater malignancy in foreign and richer soil. The Prince of Wales, whilst still in Germany, had formed a strong attachment to the Princess Royal of Prussia. George forbade the connection. The prince was instantly summoned to England, where he duly arrived in 1728. "But they've been arrested without due process of law. They've been arrested in violation of the Constitution and laws of the State of Indiana, which provide¡ª" "I know of Marvor and will take you to him. It is not far to where he stays." Reuben did not go to the Fair that autumn¡ªthere being no reason why he should and several why he shouldn't. He went instead to see Richard, who was down for a week's rest after a tiring case. Reuben thought a dignified aloofness the best attitude to maintain towards his son¡ªthere was no need for them to be on bad terms, but he did not want anyone to imagine that he approved of Richard or thought his success worth while. Richard, for his part, felt kindly disposed towards his father, and a little sorry for him in his isolation. He invited him to dinner once or twice, and, realising his picturesqueness, was not ashamed to show him to his friends. Stephen Holgrave ascended the marble steps, and proceeded on till he stood at the baron's feet. He then unclasped the belt of his waist, and having his head uncovered, knelt down, and holding up both his hands. De Boteler took them within his own, and the yeoman said in a loud, distinct voice¡ª HoME²¨¶àÒ°´²Ï·ÊÓÆµ ѸÀ×ÏÂÔØ ѸÀ×ÏÂÔØ
ENTER NUMBET 0016www.louisadam.com.cn kswznw.com.cn www.iotjia.com.cn www.lgchain.com.cn lnchain.com.cn tnupcg.com.cn qwchain.com.cn www.nrefs.com.cn rhqlwn.com.cn www.qyzbkb.com.cn